On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:22:30 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:07:07 +0200
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > If the name is omitted, then we lose that; that is not the way
> > forward.
>
> I'm pretty sure we already addressed this in another branch of this
> thread.
No.
> Bringing
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:07:07 +0200
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> If the name is omitted, then we lose that; that is not the way
> forward.
I'm pretty sure we already addressed this in another branch of this
thread. Bringing up the workings of IRC bots doesn't add anything.
jer
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:53:13 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:30:04 +0200
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
> > Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >
> > > f...@gentoo.org
> >
> > ..
> > to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.
>
> You mean we
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:30:04 +0200
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > f...@gentoo.org
>
> ..
> to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.
You mean we should design our organisational structures around an IRC
bot now?
jer
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> f...@gentoo.org
..
to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 03:51:41 +0100
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> It's not clear what problem you're trying to solve, apart from
> removing all herd tags from every ebuild's metadata.xml.
You must have read it wrong, then.
The idea is to cut out herds.xml when looking up maintainers. Being
faced wit
Steven J. Long wrote:
> it's a bit late for that
It's never too late to improve.
//Peter
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> If people are that attached to then we should apparently fix it
> instead of removing it, possibly by making it closely resemble
> .
Well to do that you need to clear up that "ontological discussion"
which is nothing more than defining what it is you'
