On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:45:34 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> And you can challenge that with the council if you wish as I'm
> weighting that in as part of QA, thank you very much.
Again that language. Why do you talk like that?
jer
On 15:45 Sat 12 Mar , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> I actually use the fact that these are still open to judge whether a
> package has to be removed from the tree, closing them would definitely
> be a bad idea for two reasons:
I'm assuming you're talking only about broken builds here and not
"Q
Il giorno gio, 10/03/2011 alle 20.25 +, Kevin F. Quinn ha scritto:
>
> * Number of open bugs is greater than 14,000
For the record, about 10% of those are reported by me through tinderbox
(1506 open bugs reported by me as of today). A number of those date back
in 2008 and earlier, and could
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:25:10 +
"Kevin F. Quinn" wrote:
> I would guess these old untouched bugs aren't actually going to be
> touched, ever - a lot simply won't be relevant any more for one reason
> or another. All they're doing is cluttering up bugzilla.
I never understand this argument.
Kevin F. Quinn posted on Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:25:10 + as excerpted:
> Hi all,
>
> I was nosing through bugzilla, and noticed:
>
> * Number of open bugs is greater than 14,000
> * open bugs untouched > 2 years - well over 2000.
> * open bugs untouched 1 - 2 years - well over 2000.
> * open bug
