[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-12-19 Thread Steve Long
Christian Heim wrote: > That would have been antarus (Alec), current treecleaner/proxy-maint lead. > Thanks, astinus pointed me in the right direction of getting the right herd to mail to. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm initially only interested in >> maintaining packages whe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:08:29PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | I'm initially only interested in maintaining packages where I'm the > > | upstream mai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Steve Dibb
Natanael Copa wrote: That leaves me with the conclution that its best to just continue to run my own local portage tree and submit bugreports once in a while and hope for the best, just like I have always been doing. No matter what community you decide to participate in (Gentoo, local, church, w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'm initially only interested in maintaining packages where I'm the > | upstream maintainer as well. > > Ick. Rarely a good idea. That removes a layer of Q

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >> Natanael Copa schrieb: >>> Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages? >>> I'm trying to be realisti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm initially only interested in maintaining packages where I'm the | upstream maintainer as well. Ick. Rarely a good idea. That removes a layer of QA. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org W

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: > Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) > > Natanael Copa schrieb: > > Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages? > > I'm trying to be realistic. > > You can. And

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages? > I'm trying to be realistic. You can. And you can even keep out of dev fights here on the mailing list. On IRC you normally