On 28-08-2009 16:08:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > As such, we will leave
> > it local to Gentoo Prefix until we can come up with a better idea.
>
> stick it behind userland_GNU ? i dont mind extending append-ldflags
> in such a way, but the "pro" you listed originally (protect users from
>
On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:39:17 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
> > flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
>
> Er, cancel that. The proposed patch isn't robust en
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
> flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
Er, cancel that. The proposed patch isn't robust enough to catch
something like "append-ldflags -Wl,--bad-f