On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:23:17 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >>
> >> We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
> >> see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
>
On 2012-06-24 18:48, Michał Górny wrote:
Of course, another question is whether LINGUAS does actually benefit
users. If compiling another .po files takes a lot of time, probably
yes. If it doesn't, I would think about getting rid of that and just
installing everything. Additional removal can be h
On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
>> see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
>> code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between
>
On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between
qt4-r2 and cmake-utils eclasses, why not put this into a sepa
