On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 21:41:35 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner
> wrote:
> > Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
> > policy, get council approval, and write it down.
> > Don't make up silly half-solutions.
>
> Sure, but I'm not awa
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:18:04 -0500 as excerpted:
> ... a die in pkg_pretend is "fails to be permitted to emerge", not
> "fails to build". And this would be essentially a p.mask but without it
> using the portage p.mask (and its various connotations).
Exactly. =:^)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/12/12 03:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC) Duncan
> <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> And if we force some types of packages to
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:35:45 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
>>
>> > And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:20:07 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
>
> > And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
> > what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or securi
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
>> policy, get council approval, and write it down.
>> Don't make up silly half-solutions.
>
> Sure, but I'm not aware of any
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> Look, if you want to make a policy about the stuff, then make a
> policy, get council approval, and write it down.
> Don't make up silly half-solutions.
Sure, but I'm not aware of any policy at all concerning packages that
contain bundled libra
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
>> what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security.
>> Users
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted:
> And if we force some types of packages to be masked all the time, then
> what do we do if we actually need to mask them for removal or security.
> Users won't even realize they have a known flaw, because they had to
> unmask t
