Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis posted on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:37:34
+0100 as excerpted:
> 2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>> wrote:
>> > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
>> >> So let's just recognize tha
2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
> >> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
> >> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
>> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
>> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
>> that users not needing it
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a
> link to documentation with s
2010-03-20 13:51:37 Peter Hjalmarsson napisał(a):
> I have a question related to this:
>
> If I have package X which supports python2 and python 3, and I install
> it without python3 installed it will only install python2-files
> (i.e. /usr/lib/python2.x/*), right?
> What happens if I later instal
I have a question related to this:
If I have package X which supports python2 and python 3, and I install
it without python3 installed it will only install python2-files
(i.e. /usr/lib/python2.x/*), right?
What happens if I later install packages Y that is only python3, and
relies on the python3 p
On 03/20/2010 02:56 AM, Jean-Marc Hengen wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
>> ...
>
> ++ - I can only add the saying "With freedom comes great responsibility.".
>
> Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
> informations like:
> - Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to
fre 2010-03-19 klockan 05:13 -0500 skrev Dale:
> Because, when I installed gcc 4.3, I could then unmerge the old gcc.
> That's why I didn't complain about that. With python, we still have to
> have the current version plus the new version which is not being used at
> all.
>
That was if you
On 03/19/2010 08:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
You guys always make easy decisions so complicated. :P
Masking a package is not complicated.
Yes, that's why all the heated debates about Python 3 exist, because
it's all so simple.
It *i
Duncan wrote:
> ...
++ - I can only add the saying "With freedom comes great responsibility.".
Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
informations like:
- Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to the packages in the
main tree.
- Recommendations if installing
Dale posted on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:13:48 -0500 as excerpted:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:23:31 -0500
>> Dale wrote:
>>
It's being installed because it's a dependency of something you use.
Replace Python with any other library and we wouldn't be having thi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
>> Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Because it is extrem
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
Dale wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Groot wrote:
Because it is extremely useless to the great majority of users.
Most packages in the tree are useless to the great m
13 matches
Mail list logo
