Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò):
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students
> that were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would
> like that this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot
> partecipate in Summer of Code as stu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes:
> In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that
> were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that
> this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot partecipate in
> Summer of Code as
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:57:03PM +0100, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> On Sunday, 02. March 2008 20:25:09 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > > Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this
> > > choice in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
> > This brings up
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your entire argument is based on the assumption that the Summer of
> Code program's primary goal is to recruit new developers for Open
> Source projects. While this is one goal I am unsure if holding it
> above the others is necessary.
I know it's not
On Sunday, 02. March 2008 20:25:09 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this
> > choice in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
> This brings up a different point of view too.
From my point of view it's pretty simple
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this choice
> in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
This brings up a different point of view too. Why should just somebody
be rewarded financially and not someone else?
