Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-10-13 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 21:04:07 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:28:23 +0100 > Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:44:23 -0400 > > Yury German wrote: > > > > Thank you! That's very helpful. A few clarifying questions below > > to be absolutely clear. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-23 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:28:23 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:44:23 -0400 > Yury German wrote: > > Thank you! That's very helpful. A few clarifying questions below > to be absolutely clear. > > > OK so let me repeat the comments that were made on @dev (and expand a bit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-14 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:44:23 -0400 Yury German wrote: Thank you! That's very helpful. A few clarifying questions below to be absolutely clear. > OK so let me repeat the comments that were made on @dev (and expand a bit > further) and close the issue. > > 1. Maintainers are free to cc the non-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-13 Thread Yury German
OK so let me repeat the comments that were made on @dev (and expand a bit further) and close the issue. 1. Maintainers are free to cc the non-stable and experimental arches as part of their call for stabilization. It is up to the maintainer of the package to decide. 2. This is providing that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-13 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:00:06 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Matt Turner wrote: > > > I suggested that when security bugs are complete, that if there are > > exp architectures still Cc'd, that security simply reassign to the > > maintainer and let the bug continue as a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Matt Turner wrote: > I suggested that when security bugs are complete, that if there are > exp architectures still Cc'd, that security simply reassign to the > maintainer and let the bug continue as a regular stabilization bug. > Unfortunately Aaron says that this is fa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 3:43:13 AM EDT Sergei Trofimovich wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 + >> >> bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote: >> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person >> > whose email i

[gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-11 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Monday, September 11, 2017 3:43:13 AM EDT Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 + > > bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote: > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person > > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit: > >