Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-20 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Enrico Weigelt schrieb: > * Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> schrieb: > > > FWIW, you (Enrico) might get more traction if you go a more "official" > > route. Do the whole FLOSS PR bulletin thing, announcing thru LWN, > > LinuxMag, LXer, etc. Slashdot and the like wouldn't be bad, either. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-18 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> schrieb: > FWIW, you (Enrico) might get more traction if you go a more "official" > route. Do the whole FLOSS PR bulletin thing, announcing thru LWN, > LinuxMag, LXer, etc. Slashdot and the like wouldn't be bad, either. Thanks for the tip, but I'm not actually

[gentoo-dev] Re: OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:55:25 -0400 as excerpted: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> That's yet another reason why I'd like package maintainers to push >> their changes into the oss-qm repo. That would be a great help for >> others having to deal with