Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>
>> However, currently this does not play nicely with squashdelta:
>> You have to "undo" the mounting of squashdelta and have to use
>> different command (e.g. squashmount) afterwards.
>
> No, that is not correct [...]
> 2) /etc/portage/repo.postsync.d
On Mon, 18 May 2015 05:48:59 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Downsides include:
> > 2. Impossible to tweak ebuilds without setting up an overlay. This
> > might be annoying for devs/etc.
>
> It is still possible to setup a read-writable portage tree
> (using overlayf
Rich Freeman wrote:
> Downsides include:
> 2. Impossible to tweak ebuilds without setting up an overlay. This
> might be annoying for devs/etc.
It is still possible to setup a read-writable portage tree
(using overlayfs/aufs/unionfs-fuse/... e.g. using the squashmount
tool from the mv overlay).
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 17 May 2015 05:47:15 +0200 as excerpted:
> Dnia 2015-05-16, o godz. 20:38:36 Michael Orlitzky
> napisał(a):
>
>> On 05/16/2015 06:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We have gentoo-announce@g.o and gentoo-user@g.o too!
>> >
>> > That's gentoo-dev-announce. 'dev' i
Michael Orlitzky posted on Sat, 16 May 2015 20:45:08 -0400 as excerpted:
> On 05/16/2015 06:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we need a news item for this at all? Everything is backward
>>> compatible and most people don't need to do anything at all in
>>> response to the news.
>>
>> No, we d
