Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/04/10 23:19, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > That is the normal procedure when pkgmoving a package. So nothing > special. :) I'm a bit worried because I assume that moving packages is not an everyday action for most developers. >> - Pushing news out to Gentoo users (and developers) > > F

[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Sebastian Pipping : > Is that a good idea? > Maybe we should restrict the bug to status updates on moving and keep > discussions on here? I don't expect too many discussions. :) > > Anyone can start moving the packages > > over properly to dev-vcs (with profiles/updates entries of course),

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 17:47, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > There seems to be a lot more to it: > - Updating eclasses? > - Updating documentation > - Updating reverse dependencies? > - Pushing news out to Gentoo users (and developers) > - Update package names used in Layman (my task) > - This is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/04/10 17:38, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Sebastian Pipping : >> Agreed, "scm" is a bad choice. > > So it is really tracked in > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56967 now. If there is > anything to comment do it there. Is that a good idea? Maybe we should restrict the bug

[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Sebastian Pipping : > Agreed, "scm" is a bad choice. So it is really tracked in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56967 now. If there is anything to comment do it there. Anyone can start moving the packages over properly to dev-vcs (with profiles/updates entries of course), just make

[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Dirkjan Ochtman : > As the primary maintainer for mercurial, hgsubversion and hg-git, I > would prefer dev-vcs. Yes, I agree now, too. > I wonder, would a Python re-implementation of git libraries belong in > dev-vcs or in dev-python (it's currently dev-python/dulwich)? Up to your common

[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:07, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > as dev-util is really crowded, maybe splitting off a category for > source code management systems would be a good idea.  They are more > important today than some years ago. >  Are any of you against such a split? My proposal would be to