Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds

2013-01-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Michał Górny wrote: >> How does something not have a homepage? If upstream is gone, then by >> definition, gentoo's the "upstream" as we're distributing it, so >> gentoo.org becomes the homepage. > If something is a six-liner made by Gentoo and for Gentoo, noone care

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds

2013-01-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/13/2013 12:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > If something is a six-liner made by Gentoo and for Gentoo, noone > cares enough to create a homepage for it. > > http://gentoo.org is the most useless 'homepage' value you can use. > It doesn't mean any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds

2013-01-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:33:27 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Michał Górny posted on Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:24:02 +0100 as excerpted: > > > Hello, > > > > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in: > > > > HOMEPAGE.missing 1 > >app-ad

[gentoo-dev] Re: Lifting the HOMEPAGE requirement for ebuilds

2013-01-13 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:24:02 +0100 as excerpted: > Hello, > > Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results in: > > HOMEPAGE.missing 1 >app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild > > Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies fo