Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: License groups in ebuilds

2012-05-12 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 12 May 2012 21:05:06 +0200 > Torsten Veller wrote: >> The perl-module.eclass offers a default LICENSE as >> LICENSE="${LICENSE:-|| ( Artistic GPL-1 GPL-2 GPL-3 )}" >> >> So if a distribution uses "the same license as Perl 5 itself" you

[gentoo-dev] Re: License groups in ebuilds

2012-05-12 Thread Torsten Veller
* Ciaran McCreesh : > On Sat, 12 May 2012 21:05:06 +0200 > Torsten Veller wrote: > > The perl-module.eclass offers a default LICENSE as > > LICENSE="${LICENSE:-|| ( Artistic GPL-1 GPL-2 GPL-3 )}" > > > > So if a distribution uses "the same license as Perl 5 itself" you can > > just drop the LICEN

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: License groups in ebuilds

2012-05-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 12 May 2012 21:05:06 +0200 Torsten Veller wrote: > The perl-module.eclass offers a default LICENSE as > LICENSE="${LICENSE:-|| ( Artistic GPL-1 GPL-2 GPL-3 )}" > > So if a distribution uses "the same license as Perl 5 itself" you can > just drop the LICENSE from the ebuild (as long no for

[gentoo-dev] Re: License groups in ebuilds

2012-05-12 Thread Torsten Veller
* Kent Fredric : > I'd welcome groups so we can have a "Perl_5" group. The lions share of > modules published on CPAN are licensed "Under the same license as Perl > 5 Itself", which implies "|| ( GPL-2 Artistic-1 )" Perl is licensed as | This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/