> "MG" == Mike Gilbert writes:
MG> Chromium tarballs are actually around 140 MB. It would be
MG> interesting to see if we can trim that tarball down.
Woops. Misremembered. It is qt that is over 200 MB.
On the plus side it is going down. Chromium 5 was ~160 MB.
MG> For comparison, Firefo
On 3/10/11 9:33 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Chromium tarballs are actually around 140 MB. It would be interesting
> to see if we can trim that tarball down.
Oh yes, we can. I guess the biggest problem is testing, but we can
certainly remove more from the tarball.
If anyone's interested, it's src/to
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:04 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "PH" == Paweł Hajdan, writes:
>
> PH> That's the chromium-bin, really. The difference is that chromium has
> PH> more deps and takes more time to compile than grub. Also, it has much
> PH> more frequent releases, and almost every stable r
> "PH" == Paweł Hajdan, writes:
PH> That's the chromium-bin, really. The difference is that chromium has
PH> more deps and takes more time to compile than grub. Also, it has much
PH> more frequent releases, and almost every stable release is a security
PH> update.
And every one of those chro
On 3/5/11 11:05 AM, Duncan wrote:
> What about handling chromium-bin the same way amd64 handles grub-static?
> They create a standard binpkg of the normal grub ebuild (using
> standardized USE flags, of course), using that as the source tarball for
> the grub-static ebuild, which then simply eb
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Dale wrote:
> It seems you correct the first time.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tmpfs
>
> I found the same examples in other paces as well. One is in the mount man
> page.
While this is drifting off-topic this is not the case. You can limit
the size of a tmpf
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I need to
>> make sure I have /var/tmp/portage symlinked back to a non-tmpfs
>> location whenever I build it or else the system pretty-much dies from
>> a lack of RAM.
>
> Then I'd say you hav
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your defin
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:23:34 +0100 as excerpted:
> On 3/5/11 12:58 AM, Alex Alexander wrote:
>> I can also give you a binpkg from one of my chroots :P
>
> It sounds like a possible option. We could then advertise those binpkgs
> on the project page, or make them semi-offi
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't in
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :)
Just checked and the last
11 matches
Mail list logo
