Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-22 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21/06/12 08:24 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 06/21/2012 06:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> we're a DISTRO - we integrate and ship what upstream gives us... > > RHEL is a distribution, but I understand that RedHat does a great > deal of upstream progr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 06/22/2012 01:10 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 06/22/2012 01:02 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Richard Yao posted on Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:33:22 -0400 as excerpted: >> >>> A firmware replacement for the BIOS does not need to worry about floppy >>> drives, hard drives, optical drives, usb devices, isa devices,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 06/22/2012 01:02 AM, Duncan wrote: > Richard Yao posted on Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:33:22 -0400 as excerpted: > >> A firmware replacement for the BIOS does not need to worry about floppy >> drives, hard drives, optical drives, usb devices, isa devices, pci >> devices and pci express drives, etcetera

[gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Duncan
Richard Yao posted on Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:33:22 -0400 as excerpted: > A firmware replacement for the BIOS does not need to worry about floppy > drives, hard drives, optical drives, usb devices, isa devices, pci > devices and pci express drives, etcetera, because those live on buses, > which the ke

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 06/21/2012 06:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Roy Bamford wrote: >> >>> So when you build a dud kernel and flash your BIOS with it, and we >>> all build the odd dud, your motherboard is bricked. >> >> Any firmware modification has potential to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Roy Bamford wrote: > >> So when you build a dud kernel and flash your BIOS with it, and we >> all build the odd dud, your motherboard is bricked. > > Any firmware modification has potential to brick, and shouldn't be > done unless you are comfo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Roy Bamford wrote: > > > I take it the above statement is based on the kernel being > > > directly placed within the BIOS/firmware/nvram on the board, This is sometimes called Linux-as-bootloader (LAB/lab for short) in the coreboot project. > > > such that you couldn't boot anything else but tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2012.06.21 16:05, Richard Yao wrote: > On 06/21/2012 11:00 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> A firmware replacement for the BIOS does not need to worry about > >> floppy drives, hard drives, optical drives, usb devices, isa > >> devices, pci devices and pci express drives, etcetera, because > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Yao
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/21/2012 11:00 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> A firmware replacement for the BIOS does not need to worry about >> floppy drives, hard drives, optical drives, usb devices, isa >> devices, pci devices and pci express drives, etcetera, because >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21/06/12 05:33 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 06/21/2012 04:08 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Richard Yao posted on Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:23 -0400 as >> excerpted: >> >>> 3. How does getting a x86 system to boot differ from getting a >>> MIPS system or ARM s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 06/21/2012 04:08 AM, Duncan wrote: > Richard Yao posted on Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:23 -0400 as excerpted: > >> 3. How does getting a x86 system to boot differ from getting a MIPS >> system or ARM system to boot? Does it only work because the vendors made >> it work or is x86 fundamentally harder

[gentoo-dev] Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot

2012-06-21 Thread Duncan
Richard Yao posted on Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:23 -0400 as excerpted: > 3. How does getting a x86 system to boot differ from getting a MIPS > system or ARM system to boot? Does it only work because the vendors made > it work or is x86 fundamentally harder? I can answer this one. x86 is harder at t