On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:04:11 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > No, what I actually say is *why* things don't work, and if it hasn't
> > already been explained, I say how to fix it.
> Oh? Where on Earth did you do that in this thread? All you've said so
> far is that preserve-
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:04:11 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> Yes, it is hard to admit one has problems; how are things going with
> your human interaction problems? (They don't seem to be going that
> well, given your continued attitude.) I mean, you have admitted to
> yourself that you do have issu
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> No, what I actually say is *why* things don't work, and if it hasn't
> already been explained, I say how to fix it.
Oh? Where on Earth did you do that in this thread? All you've said so far is
that preserve-libs is "an awful hack that doesn't really work, is
conceptually
On 03/31/2012 04:49 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:52:53 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Alex Alexander
>> wrote:
>>> @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
>>> should be in stable already. I've been using
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:52:53 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 Alex Alexander
> wrote:
>> @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
>> should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
>> boxes for years wi
