On 03/11/15 06:24, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a
>> good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review
>> platform as it is sufficient with read-access
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a
> good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review
> platform as it is sufficient with read-access to repositories.
>
> Thanks for showing at lea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/11/15 14:24, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional, allowing
> people to work as they wish.
It's been a while since I looked at it outside of GHC, so please bear
in mind these things might have chang
On 02/11/15 22:08, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> It is tailored to Facebook's workflow. Their workflow does not
> coincide with most other people's workflow. It doesn't work for my
> company, and I suspect it won't work for Gentoo either.
Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional, allo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/02/2015 01:26 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for
>>> pull requests and code review and su
On 02/11/15 06:23, hasufell wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work.
>>
On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might w
Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:28:10 +0100 as excerpted:
> By reading your answer, I'm not sure if it is clear or obvious for most
> users how the workflow between the Gentoo infra <-> Github infra
> functions so maybe we should explain it one more time: [...]
> 4) How do we merge
Monday 02 Nov 2015 09:29:48, Duncan wrote :
> Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:33:49 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> > [gerrit]
> >
> > Anyway, just my 2 cents on the topic. Have a look and you'll see in
> > terms of features, I think it's on a par with Github. And it's open
> > source. ;)
>
Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:33:49 +0100 as excerpted:
> [gerrit]
>
> Anyway, just my 2 cents on the topic. Have a look and you'll see in
> terms of features, I think it's on a par with Github. And it's open
> source. ;)
FWIW from previous gerrit suggestions...
The problem ther
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 01 Nov 2015 19:34:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 04:44:39 +1100 Michael Palimaka
> wrote:
>
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
>> instance against gento
11 matches
Mail list logo
