[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-14 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > [...] This is pushed out now. I also ended up dropping LTO support for 4.5. If you're using LTO as shipped in 4.5 you are braver than anyone deserves to be. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 00:57 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 05/01/2013 03:00 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > >> I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so > >> bad with circular deps (I'm looking at y

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/01/2013 03:00 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so >> bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100 > Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > >> On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> > I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so >> > bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so > > bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random > > failures that I only enable tes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 01 May 2013 01:29:05 -0400 "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > Sadly it is so > bad that we have a FEATURES=test-fail-continue I can't really say > anything negative, that fact really says it all... My beef is not with the existence of this FEATURE but that it's enabled in the dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so > bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random > failures that I only enable tests for my own packages. Sadly it is so > bad that we have a FEATURES=t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-04-30 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/30/2013 11:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:33:00 +0800 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> On 05/01/2013 11:25 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> Since people like to start whinging threads every time we have to change >>> flags on gcc this is a

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-04-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:33:00 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/01/2013 11:25 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > Since people like to start whinging threads every time we have to change > > flags on gcc this is a friendly notice of some upcoming changes. > > > [snip lots of good ideas] > > > > Any though