[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-11-11 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:22:17 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > 4.6.2 is now in the tree. It will be unmasked next weekend. Yeah I'm a tease. Looks like we have enough issues that I want to do another patchset. We also have showstopper bugs in grub:0 and libmpeg2 that need looking at. As always, if yo

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-10-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:38:32 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > Now that I finally have some time for Gentoo.I'd like to get GCC 4.6 unmasked > sometime in the next month. Thanks to everyone but me, we only have a few > bugs remaining on the tracker. None of them I consider critical except maybe > mplaye

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-09-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:10:13 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 20.38 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto: > > If you have any issues with 4.6 itself or patches you need applied, > > now is > > the time to speak up. > > There should be already a bug open about valgrind: ev

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-09-25 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 20.38 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto: > If you have any issues with 4.6 itself or patches you need applied, > now is > the time to speak up. There should be already a bug open about valgrind: even when _not_ using DWARF-4 (which breaks binutils, btw) the new gcc uses n