Nikos Chantziaras posted on Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:07:08 +0300 as excerpted:
> On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 Ben de Groot
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted for
>>> "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
> for "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most straightforward and least
> confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know.
On 28 July 2012 15:43, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> > On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds
>> >> in the t
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >>
> >> In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds
> >> in the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[...]
So what would be the methodology of making sure a
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[...]
So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper
slot?
Obviously you would need to make sure that the package actua
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>> In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
>>> the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
>>
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
>> the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
>> proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it may not
in fact support it.
This can be trouble if the app
10 matches
Mail list logo
