[gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures

2011-03-22 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:09:46 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 3/21/11 11:02 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > It does to me, I use them all the time. ;) The important part is that we > > install the test results, which can then be used for regression testing when > > rolling patchsets. > > I see, i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures

2011-03-22 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to understand the problem better - do you know what causes > those test failures? I don't expect a "complete" answer because that'd > probably be a half of actually fixing the failures. They both have huge test suites cover

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures

2011-03-22 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/21/11 11:02 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > It does to me, I use them all the time. ;) The important part is that we > install the test results, which can then be used for regression testing when > rolling patchsets. I see, it makes sense. I guess you're comparing the test results before and after ro

[gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures

2011-03-21 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:07:33 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > sys-devel/gcc runs tests, but the results are ignored and I remember the > tests fail most of the time. s/most/all > Because the tests take long time to run and fail anyway (I understand > it's non-trivial to fix those on Gentoo s