Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc)

2014-06-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Steven J. Long wrote: > So which way do you actually prefer? > > You appear to be arguing for, and implementing, common code by EAPI, > in the rest of your mail. Since that's always been the point of > them, based on developer consensus about what is truly essentia

[gentoo-dev] Re: Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc)

2014-06-19 Thread Steven J. Long
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 03:30:10PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-06-15, o godz. 07:00:15 > Rich Freeman napisał(a): > > > The Eclass argument goes like this: > > Eclasses already work in every PM. Half of what we're debating is > > already in eutils. Why move this code into the PM, wher