Doug Goldstein posted
eafa4c130903101013s3bb64404g9e65ca0fc8973...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:13:36 -0500:
> So really an effective solution might be for the recruiters/retirement
> staff to change a user's shell with a script that spits out a message
> that says som
2009/3/10 Doug Goldstein :
> So really an effective solution might be for the recruiters/retirement staff
> to change a user's shell with a script that spits out a message that says
> something to the effect of:
>
> "You have been inactive for a while. Please contact recruiters to re-enable
> your
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Pierre-Yves Rofes" posted
> a4345526fd26a2a6f5dd3cccb4e9767d.squir...@mail.rofes.fr, excerpted below,
> on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:55 +0100:
>
> >> We don't want some still active authorization and key
> >> from two years a
On Tuesday 10 of March 2009 16:29:56 Alec Warner wrote:
> > With some devs reviewing gentoo-commits@, I highly doubt that this commit
> > could go unnoticed more than a few hours.
> really? cause I bet I could slip something in; now I'm motivated to try ;p
I somewhat share the view that's rather
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote:
> On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote:
>> Gordon Malm posted
>> 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar
>> 2009 16:17:48 -0700:
>>
>>> There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit
"Pierre-Yves Rofes" posted
a4345526fd26a2a6f5dd3cccb4e9767d.squir...@mail.rofes.fr, excerpted below,
on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:55 +0100:
>> We don't want some still active authorization and key
>> from two years ago getting stolen and used to try to slip a bad commit
>> under the radar [...]
>
On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote:
> Gordon Malm posted
> 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar
> 2009 16:17:48 -0700:
>
>> There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit
>> abilities. Perhaps in the case a dev wants to contribute but c
Gordon Malm posted
200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar
2009 16:17:48 -0700:
> There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit
> abilities. Perhaps in the case a dev wants to contribute but cannot in
> the near future their commit privs can just
