On 9/3/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really wish people would take the time to either ask the Release
Engineering team, or learn how we work before they go off making
accusations against us.
There was no accusation there. I picked on X only for its popularity
and relative e
On 9/3/06, Luis Francisco Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
> The problem I see is that for Gentoo the releases are not really
> useful milestones for most projects. A release is really significant
That is not a problem. That is a feature.
A small clarification may be nece
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 07:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> But to be honest, stabilization of packages was not my point. ((BTW, stable
> X.org, KDE or GNOME would IMO delay the release for a week, so users wouldn't
> need to upgrade in such a short time frame - but that's what I think))
Peopl
Richard Fish wrote:
On 9/2/06, Wiktor Wandachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suppose that there is a way that Gentoo can follow, only that its
leaders,
developers and users need to see it clearly. Is there a publicly visible
page that contains current goals for new releases? Where all sub-pr
Richard Fish wrote:
> > I suppose that there is a way that Gentoo can follow, only that its leaders,
> > developers and users need to see it clearly. Is there a publicly visible
> > page that contains current goals for new releases? Where all sub-project
> > leaders could add their own goals, cohe
On 9/2/06, Wiktor Wandachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suppose that there is a way that Gentoo can follow, only that its leaders,
developers and users need to see it clearly. Is there a publicly visible
page that contains current goals for new releases? Where all sub-project
leaders could ad
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> When I think about where Gentoo was when we turned into a democracy
> years ago, and where Gentoo is now, I don't see much of a difference on
> the large scale. We lack any global vision for where Gentoo is going, we
> can't agree on who our audience is, and everyone's jus
On 2006.08.27 22:37, Duncan wrote:
Roy Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[snip]
> If the council are to undertake the management of Gentoo, its terms
> of reference need to be drastically altered to allow them to
> undertake the management process defined above.
>
> In sh
Roy Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:28:04 +0100:
> I think the problem(s) stem from the way Gentoo is organised now. I'm
> sure you will shoot me down if I'm wrong. In summary. Gentoo is a loose
> knit group of packages with individual
Duncan wrote:
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 26 Aug
2006 12:17:03 +0200:
Quit assuming I mean anything, you're batting zero for two right now.
What's the problem? I wasn't sure how you meant it, so i assumed you
meant it that way. As for
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 26 Aug
2006 12:17:03 +0200:
>> Quit assuming I mean anything, you're batting zero for two right now.
>
> What's the problem? I wasn't sure how you meant it, so i assumed you
> meant it that way. As for batting
11 matches
Mail list logo
