hasufell posted on Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:20:14 +0200 as excerpted: > However, we should encourage gentoo-internal projects to become more > strict (and e.g. only have one or two "pushers").
Just noting there's also the "review required, but after getting it, go ahead and push" model. Same number of pushers, but better professionalism and code quality. It seems to be working very well for portage, now, and I'm pleased to see the greater bus factor as well as higher professionalism and code quality, that seems to be the result. =:^) And the fact that they're pushing the posting and reviews to the portage- dev list increases transparency as well, for those non-devs that like to follow developments on such system- and gentoo-critical packages. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
