Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We're going to talk about arch keywording policies. IMO we should
> have a standard policy "if you own and use ${ARCH} then you may
> keyword your packages for ${ARCH}" with the exception of the sys-*/
> categories.
No, please not. Arch teams often discovered p
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:31:02 +0100
Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the proposal itself, I'd add a suggestion to let the arch team
> know by e-mail about it, so they can maintain general knowledge
> (better wording here, probably) about their (~)keyword in the tree.
Please do not
On Saturday 03 February 2007, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> ("keyword", not "stabilize")
keywording $ARCH and stabilizing mean the same thing to me
-mike
pgpWOeiXy7ljw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:17:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after all the pains we went through to enforce "if you want to stabilize on
> $ARCH, talk to the $ARCH team", how is this a good thing ?
I think Mike meant adding ~arch keywords - "if you own and use ${ARCH} then
you m
On Saturday 03 February 2007, Mike Doty wrote:
> We're going to talk about arch keywording policies. IMO we should have
> a standard policy "if you own and use ${ARCH} then you may keyword your
> packages for ${ARCH}" with the exception of the sys-*/ categories.
after all the pains we went throug
Mike Doty schrieb:
> Speakup now to get your input in.
Why opening up the keywording like that?
Most times a friendly ping on irc to get permissions to keyword x
packages on own hardware succeedes and you're done.
communication++
Jokey
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
