Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-11 Thread Markos Chandras
On 01/11/2014 11:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick > maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about > them as much. > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 11:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: > If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick > maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care > about them as much. > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-11 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about them as much. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 11 January 2014 11:01, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El sáb, 11

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 10:57 +, Markos Chandras escribió: > On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > >> how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it > >> wrong > >> wouldn't really care which her

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-11 Thread Markos Chandras
On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it >> wrong >> wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by. >> > > I'm not saying it makes a difference, sorr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-10 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it > wrong > wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by. > I'm not saying it makes a difference, sorry I didn't make it clear. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes fla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 09 January 2014 15:24:00 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering > > up base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions > > to a single herd. > > Yeah

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-09 Thread Markos Chandras
On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering up > base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a > single herd. Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single pers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2014-01-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we have > >> needed to go ahead and fix some bugs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2013-12-09 Thread Markos Chandras
On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > I stopped caring about pambase when people decided to break it. > > I'm still officially pam herd as maintainer of Linux-PAM, pam_ssh I don't > use and care very little about. > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2013-12-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Montag 09 Dezember 2013, 14:21:17 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: > I stopped caring about pambase when people decided to break it. > link please? -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer kde, council signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status

2013-12-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
I stopped caring about pambase when people decided to break it. I'm still officially pam herd as maintainer of Linux-PAM, pam_ssh I don't use and care very little about. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramo