El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 23:58 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile?
>
> Yes.
>
Just done
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile?
Yes.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
El mié, 11-04-2012 a las 13:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 04/11/2012 09:12 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >> OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions
> >> point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome p
On 04/11/2012 09:12 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions
point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that
solution?
As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions
> point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that
> solution?
As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for desktop. There's nothing
inherently "g
