Hi!
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >
> >> [0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this
> >> scheme, at least for some more critical packages.
> > ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages.
>
> Exactly. So suppose th
On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
[0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this
scheme, at least for some more critical packages.
ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages.
Exactly. So suppose that we do stabilize a non-critical package on an
arch where it fails.
Hi!
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:23:21 +0200 Tobias Klausmann
> wrote:
> > arch_A maintainer sees ALLARCHES keyworded bug, and tests
> > everything on A. Upon keywording and running repoman, she
> > finds that two other arches need additional deps. What to do?
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:23:21 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> arch_A maintainer sees ALLARCHES keyworded bug, and tests
> everything on A. Upon keywording and running repoman, she finds
> that two other arches need additional deps. What to do?
Use common sense? This isn't brain surgery.
> If an
