On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:12:37 Duncan wrote:
> 1) Will this allow building grub from amd64/no-multilib, thus avoiding
> having to have grub-static? That's the one thing I don't like about no-
> multilib, having to use the pre-built grub-static.
grub needs a C library to link `grub`. at t
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:12:37 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> 2) What about grub-2, and while we're on it, is a switch to that expected
> any time soon, and/or is there a grub-static-2 in the wings? With the
> grub-1 gpt patches (and hopefully btrfs support at some point) I'm n
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:15:47 -0500 as excerpted:
> the advantage is that it should obsolete the separate kgcc64 package for
> most people. and i think it might help out with the multilib bootstrap
> issue: you can't build multilib gcc without a multilib glibc, and can't
> bu
