On 5 March 2010 16:23, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I assume that only members of QA can actually step up and fix the problem.
> Otherwise the games heard will complain that random devs are touching their
> packages. I just assume that but I am not willing to step into their
> "territory" and this is
On Friday 05 March 2010 17:06:21 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 5 March 2010 15:22, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2010 15:17:06 Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> So step up and maintain it!
> >
> > games herd already maintains that package . At least this is what I see
> > on metadata.xml
>
>
On 5 March 2010 15:22, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 15:17:06 Ben de Groot wrote:
>> So step up and maintain it!
>>
> games herd already maintains that package . At least this is what I see on
> metadata.xml
Nominally, yes. But if a package has open QA and security bugs and
pa
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:17:06 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 19:17, Victor Ostorga wrote:
> > 0.8.5 was released on february 23, 2010 and the patch at bug
> > 255453 seems to work fine.
> > Please don't remove one of the greatest open source games.
>
> So step up and maintain it!
>
> C
On 4 March 2010 19:17, Victor Ostorga wrote:
> 0.8.5 was released on february 23, 2010 and the patch at bug
> 255453 seems to work fine.
> Please don't remove one of the greatest open source games.
So step up and maintain it!
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desk
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:35:10 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (03 Mar 2010)
> # Masked for QA, security
> #
> # Internal copies of vuln. zlib, jpeg, speex and likely
> # others
> #
> # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255453
> #
> # Masked for removal in 60 days.
> games-fp
