Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-28 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Robin H. Johnson wrote: If X or gtk were relevant to the client, then yes. Better be ready for USE flag for every GUI toolkit then (yuck). You only need a USE flag for the toolkit when there's a choice between multiple toolkits. The X flag is for a choice between any X interface or none. Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-28 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:38:10PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote: > >I can't find the bug right now, but this did pop up where the client was > >a GUI app, and they wanted to get away from needing all the dependencies > >it pulled in that way. > Would controlling building of the client via a flag such as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-27 Thread Ryan Tandy
Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:50:43AM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: Two things I'm always wondering about when this topic comes up: - is there really a need for USE=client? In most cases people request to exclude the server part, can't remember ever seeing a request to exclude

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:50:43AM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > Two things I'm always wondering about when this topic comes up: > - is there really a need for USE=client? In most cases people request > to exclude the server part, can't remember ever seeing a request to > exclude the client. I can't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-27 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:10:58 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - USE=server/client/minimal poses problem when it comes to dealing > with dependencies that require the server or the client. The best > that is doable with the present portage is checking that the app is > compiled

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:12:01AM -0800, Mike Doty wrote: > Francesco Riosa wrote: > >After irc conversation also "dev-db/mysql-client" will NOT be added, we > >stick with USE="minimal". The default for the "virtual/mysql" will be > >"dev-db/mysql-community" > D'oh, I would have liked to have a se

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-23 Thread Mike Doty
Francesco Riosa wrote: After irc conversation also "dev-db/mysql-client" will NOT be added, we stick with USE="minimal". The default for the "virtual/mysql" will be "dev-db/mysql-community" D'oh, I would have liked to have a separate package for the client... Can we switch from +-minimal indica

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-23 Thread Francesco Riosa
Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 23-11-2006 00:12:45 +, Francesco Riosa wrote with possible deletions: >> Also if you are the maintainer of one of the mentioned [5] packages >> please avoid version bumps until tomorrow when I'll apply the changes to >> the tree (see [2] for an explanation) > > [snip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-23 Thread Francesco Riosa
After irc conversation also "dev-db/mysql-client" will NOT be added, we stick with USE="minimal". The default for the "virtual/mysql" will be "dev-db/mysql-community" -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [treequake] virtual/mysql addition

2006-11-22 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 23-11-2006 00:12:45 +, Francesco Riosa wrote with possible deletions: > Also if you are the maintainer of one of the mentioned [5] packages > please avoid version bumps until tomorrow when I'll apply the changes to > the tree (see [2] for an explanation) [snip] > [5] > profiles/default-dar