Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-28 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 05:53 +, Steve Long wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > >> branding: Enable Gentoo specific branding > >> [questionable, as used for splashes/shortcuts/artwork] > > > > Well, my personal opinion here is that we should enable this by default > > on *at least* the desktop

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-27 Thread Steve Long
Chris Gianelloni wrote: >> branding: Enable Gentoo specific branding >> [questionable, as used for splashes/shortcuts/artwork] > > Well, my personal opinion here is that we should enable this by default > on *at least* the desktop profiles, as providing sensible defaults and > branding isn't outs

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-27 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
No on logrotate per several previous conversations. The majority of the ones listed are not globally relevent which is the first criteria for creating a new global use flag. Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: No, to the following (others already gave reasons): > server12 > custom-cflags 7 > multislot 6 > editor5 Is ambigious, too. [-] editor (games-arcade/bomns): enables building

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-20 Thread Ryan Hill
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: custom-cflags 7 This one shouldn't be a use flag at all. Pushing it global will just encourage even more people to use it. +1 -- looks like christmas at fifty-five degrees this latitude weakens