On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:33:45 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I though the goal was to rid profiles/ of files other than profiles.
>
> Thinking about it, putting it into profiles would make a lot of sense.
> For example, one would want to def
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> I though the goal was to rid profiles/ of files other than profiles.
Thinking about it, putting it into profiles would make a lot of sense.
For example, one would want to define any systemd paths only in
non-systemd profiles.
> I can change the GL
Dnia 8 czerwca 2016 09:17:06 CEST, Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 +0200
>> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>>> Therefore I think that repository metadata is the wrong place for
>>> storing the install-mask.conf file. It is config
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Therefore I think that repository metadata is the wrong place for
>> storing the install-mask.conf file. It is configuration, specific to
>> Portage (but not to the repository), so /usr/s
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 May 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Sometime around a year ago, I started working on extending
> > INSTALL_MASK to support well-defined locations. The work was never
> > finished, and I just found my old specification f
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> Sometime around a year ago, I started working on extending
> INSTALL_MASK to support well-defined locations. The work was never
> finished, and I just found my old specification for it. I've cleaned
> it up a bit, and extended it into a complete GLE
