Alec Warner schrieb:
> I think the question isn't 'why is this functionality being made
> available'; I think to me it is useful piece of code.
>
> I question its inclusion in the PM though; I would rather see it in
> eutils or something similar.
>
> Arguably you could inherit a function from eut
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
>>> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file
>>> name.
>>
>> On
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:43:12PM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
> >> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file
> >> name.
> >
> > One
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
>> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file
>> name.
>
> One needs exceptions for all kind of systems, for example I had to
> workaround
Hi,
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Leverton wrote:
> > 2008/9/4 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> * The 'unpack' helper function recognizes ;sf=tbz2 and ;sf=tgz
> >> extensions, for interoperability with gitweb.
> >>
> >> * SRC_URI supports a syntax extension which allows customiza
