[gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Steven J. Long
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:27:36 +0100 > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > Not an API. APIs are bad. What we should have is a good set of > > > lightweight Unix-friendly command line tools. See, for example, the > > > "Scripting Commands" section of "man cave". >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:02 Mon 13 Jan , Steven J. Long wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:15:37PM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > > Realistically, we have to keep updating them both in parallel. > > > pkgcore needs to be brought up to portage-level functionality, > > Yeah but it already outshines under the h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:50:44 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Andreas K Huettel wrote: > > > So far, I dont know of any work on the exact EAPI-6 feature set yet. > > We should maybe open a new thread on that, *if* there is already > > something. > > I've started collecti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:02:10 + "Steven J. Long" wrote: > Yeah but it already outshines under the hood: all you're talking > about is EAPI and radhermit is working on it; pkgcore's response to EAPI 6 is something to hold your breath for. > I'm sure he and dol-sen would be happy for more help

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Andreas K Huettel wrote: > So far, I dont know of any work on the exact EAPI-6 feature set yet. > We should maybe open a new thread on that, *if* there is already > something. I've started collecting things already some months ago: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Future_EAP

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Montag 13 Januar 2014, 13:28:13 schrieb Alexander Berntsen: > > Updating both in parallel isn't hard: once pkgcore is up to EAPI-5, > > EAPI-6 isn't that much work (mostly bash afair.) So far, I dont know of any work on the exact EAPI-6 feature set yet. We should maybe open a new thread on t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/01/14 12:02, Steven J. Long wrote: > Yeah but it already outshines under the hood: all you're talking > about is EAPI and radhermit is working on it; I'm sure he and > dol-sen would be happy for more help as well, so long as it's > supportiv

[gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] pkgcore bikeshed

2014-01-13 Thread Steven J. Long
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:15:37PM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 01/13/14 03:43 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > Realistically, we have to keep updating them both in parallel. pkgcore > > needs to be brought up to portage-level functionality, Yeah but it already outshines under the hood: all