On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:11:31 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Your proposal does not look to appealing to me. What about people
> trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit?
Some packages don't use a USE flag to pull those in, since the toolkit
dependency isn't optiona
On 02/08/2010 05:22 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 14:02, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE="X" is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything
On 8 February 2010 16:22, AllenJB wrote:
> The current system caters perfectly for both people who want to avoid
> specific toolkits and those who don't care what toolkits they use.
I agree. The current system is best, in my opinion.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lx
Hi all,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nikos Chantziaras:
> >> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user
> >> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support b
On 08/02/10 14:02, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
>> On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE="X" is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything that deps on them, so I d
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE="X" is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything that deps on them, so I disagree.
I was under the impression that USE flags are fo
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> IMHO. USE="X" is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
>> everything that deps on them, so I disagree.
>
> I was under the impression that USE flags are for enabling/disabling
> features,
On 02/08/2010 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/2010 02:12 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ig
On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras:
A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user
has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt
being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a
package has a
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:30 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead onl
On 02/08/2010 02:12 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
>> On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
>>> like whining :P
>>>
>>> A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instea
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
"gtk", "qt" and the like. This should be declared abs
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras :
> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user
> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt
> being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a
> package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one of thos
14 matches
Mail list logo
