On 09/24/2015 09:59 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
Again, I'm not arguing for or against Gerrit, just relating my
experience with it.
Hello Todd,
I'm not a dev, but I have over a dozen ebuilds I have hacked together.
They need work, and there are devs who are helping me. Some of these
ebuilds are be
* James Le Cuirot [150924 04:55]:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:55:00 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> > I hadn't thought about that angle. If our access backbone is via SSH
> > (and thus the filesystem/machine users) then I'm really not sure how
> > to implement a GitLab or Gerrit instance while h
* Michael Orlitzky [150923 08:31]:
> On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> >
> > We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems seem to
> > be with people having issues with git itself (it was new to almost
> > everyone on the team) and not embracing a good workflow with
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:55:00 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I hadn't thought about that angle. If our access backbone is via SSH
> (and thus the filesystem/machine users) then I'm really not sure how
> to implement a GitLab or Gerrit instance while hooking into the
> filesystem. Allowing users to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 05:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
>>
>> We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems
>> seem to be with people having issues with git itself (it was new
>> to almost ever
On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
>
> We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems seem to
> be with people having issues with git itself (it was new to almost
> everyone on the team) and not embracing a good workflow with it (or
> trying to only use git via Eclipse.)
* James Le Cuirot [150920 04:45]:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:12:06 -0400
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> > Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager,
> > in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every
> > single repository?
> >
> > Web projects ten
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:12:06 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager,
> in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every
> single repository?
>
> Web projects tend to assume that they're the only application/user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/19/2015 05:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/19/2015 05:16 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>
>> We'd just need a developer who's experienced in maintaining and
>> setting them up.
>>
>
> Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by
On 09/19/2015 05:16 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> We'd just need a developer who's experienced in maintaining and
> setting them up.
>
Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager,
in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every
single repository?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/16/2015 03:07 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Saturday 12 of September 2015 21:12:25 Michał Górny wrote:
>
> | What are your thoughts? Any other proposals?
>
> Well, there's always an option to set up infra hosted Gerrit or
> Gitlab and forg
On Saturday 12 of September 2015 21:12:25 Michał Górny wrote:
| What are your thoughts? Any other proposals?
Well, there's always an option to set up infra hosted Gerrit or Gitlab and
forget about Github workflow altogether...
regards
MM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
El lun, 14-09-2015 a las 00:19 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió:
[...]
> Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is
> free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract:
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html
>
> "However, Gentoo will never depend upon
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:37:17 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman
> napisał(a):
> >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> >> ==
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 02:31:11PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:15:14PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
> > Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached
> > to bugzilla.
>
> Right, thanks. In that case, I think you'll need a hook to push a
> new patch whene
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should
> be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure.
>
> Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a
> slave to whatever's hosted on gentoo.
>
>
I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should
be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure.
Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a
slave to whatever's hosted on gentoo.
That way if anything gets screwed up on github gentoo could always hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michał Górny schrieb:
> I don't know if you didn't read the proposal, or if you are unable to
> understand it. You are seriously *offending* me and the few other
> developers who are trying *really hard*.
>
> So let me make this clear: I am trying t
Dnia 2015-09-14, o godz. 00:19:38
Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300
> > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> > > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko
On 09/13/2015 11:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is
> free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract:
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html
>
> "However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:27:32 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07
> Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
>
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hello, everyone.
> > >
> > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least
> > > subop
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools lik
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like
> > > github issue tracker and github pull requests.
> >
> > It d
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> >
> > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like
> > github issue tracker and github pull requests.
> >
>
> It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who refuse
Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 19:27:17
Jason Zaman napisał(a):
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> > ==
>
> I just noticed this:
>
> https://bugs.launc
Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07
Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least
> > suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few
> > deve
On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like
> github issue tracker and github pull requests.
>
It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who refuse to
collaborate on github PRs can still collaborate on bugzilla.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least
> suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few
> developers contributing there, and the progress is often stalled by
> package mai
Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman
napisał(a):
>On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
>> ==
>>
>> My current idea would be pretty much that:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> ==
I just noticed this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1308105
it appears to mirror t
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> ==
>
> My current idea would be pretty much that:
>
> 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created f
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:30:44PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> If the patch is automatedly filed against bugzilla, people will
> assume viewing that patch tells them all they need to know.
>
> But the reality is somebody may rebase/amend/repush to the
> publicised branch location before any devel
On 13 September 2015 at 09:15, hasufell wrote:
> Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached to
> bugzilla.
I would recommend against attaching the pull in patch form against
bugzilla. It might lead to unintentionally misleading consequences.
If the patch is automatedly fil
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> 1. Many of the Gentoo developers have different nicknames on GitHub.
> Some developers don't even set their real names which makes them even
> harder to find.
This isn't directly related to your proposal, but may I jump in here:
Wouldn't i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 21:12:25 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> ==
The general idea is nice and neat.
> - handling comment edits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 23:31:11 schrieb W. Trevor King:
> Right, thanks. In that case, I think you'll need a hook to push a new
> patch whenever the GitHub branch is updated, rebased, etc. That could
> make for a lot of Bugzilla spam, bec
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:15:14PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
> Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached to
> bugzilla.
Right, thanks. In that case, I think you'll need a hook to push a new
patch whenever the GitHub branch is updated, rebased, etc. That could
make for a lot o
On 09/12/2015 11:07 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:11:27PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
>> We should probably auto-attach the patch from the pull request. This
>> can easily be done with link-rewriting, e.g.:
>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83 to
>> https://github.com/gen
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:11:27PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
> We should probably auto-attach the patch from the pull request. This
> can easily be done with link-rewriting, e.g.:
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83 to
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83.patch
> yields a nice downloadabl
On 09/12/2015 09:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration
> ==
>
> My current idea would be pretty much that:
>
> 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created for every
> pull
Hello, everyone.
The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least
suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few
developers contributing there, and the progress is often stalled by
package maintainers which are either unresponsive or not registered on
github
41 matches
Mail list logo
