Hi,
On 2019/11/10 20:21, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/10/19 12:36 PM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> What's the motivation for trying to match the UID and GID values from
>> other distributions?
>>
>> I previously tried to motivate a "purely dynamic" allocation with -1,
>> I'm showing this as an example
On 11/10/19 12:36 PM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> What's the motivation for trying to match the UID and GID values from
> other distributions?
>
> I previously tried to motivate a "purely dynamic" allocation with -1,
> I'm showing this as an example where such an implementation would once
> more be ben
Hi Michał,
You're right.
Fedora and RHEL has gdm on 42, we don't have gdm via acct-{user,group}
and it's dynamic in the ebuild.
Arch has privoxy user on 42. We also don't have acct-{user,group} for
that, enewgroup + user is both dynamic in ebuild.
What's the motivation for trying to match the
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 18:23 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of taking maintainership of the net-misc/asterisk package (and
> related), one of the cleanup items is to use the new acct-{user,group}
> method for assigning UID and GID values.
>
> As such I'd like to please reserve UID and
Hi,
As part of taking maintainership of the net-misc/asterisk package (and
related), one of the cleanup items is to use the new acct-{user,group}
method for assigning UID and GID values.
As such I'd like to please reserve UID and GID = 42 for asterisk.
Why 42?
echo -e "\x$(bc <<<"obase=16; 42")
