On 6/30/20 1:28 AM, Max Magorsch wrote:
> 1. Would you prefer this information to be displayed in packages.g.o
> using a 'developer mode' or would you prefer a separate application
> similar to the idea of project Grumpy?
I'd prefer not to scatter tools around anymore. 'Developer' mode sounds
bet
Hi,
On 2020/06/30 16:19, Max Magorsch wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:16 AM Aaron Bauman wrote:
>> Hi, Max. A couple thoughts... Just let me know if they are too crazy.
>>
>> 1. Could you enable the backend to ping devs/projects via email when a n
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:16 AM Aaron Bauman wrote:
> Hi, Max. A couple thoughts... Just let me know if they are too crazy.
>
> 1. Could you enable the backend to ping devs/projects via email when a new
> release is available for their respective package(s)
On June 29, 2020 6:28:30 PM EDT, Max Magorsch wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Some time ago, the idea of integrating packages.g.o with pkgcheck and
>repology.org came up. There have already been some discussions in bug
>725702 and 725704 regarding this.
>
>The tl;dr is that the packages.g.o backend does now par
Hi,
Some time ago, the idea of integrating packages.g.o with pkgcheck and
repology.org came up. There have already been some discussions in bug
725702 and 725704 regarding this.
The tl;dr is that the packages.g.o backend does now parse both the
pkgcheck results as well as the repology.org data. C
