Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 15:11:19 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/06/12 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > we have egetshell and egethome already. thus it's fairly easy to > > detect the transition case. if they installed the older version > > which set values that you now want to change: if ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > we have egetshell and egethome already. thus it's fairly easy to > detect the transition case. if they installed the older version > which set values that you now want to change: if has_version > ' e

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 14:32:22 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/06/12 02:09 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 13-06-2012 12:00:16 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a > >> user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 6/13/2012 2:32 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/06/12 02:09 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 13-06-2012 12:00:16 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >>> Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a >>> user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this >>> changes w

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 02:45 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/06/12 01:21 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 13/06/12 01:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:00:16 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius >>> wrote: > + ### force updates

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 01:21 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 13/06/12 01:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:00:16 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius >> wrote: > >>> + ### force updates of some user properties + >>> usermod -d "${ehome}"

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 02:09 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 13-06-2012 12:00:16 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a >> user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this >> changes with

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 02:18 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 6/13/2012 12:00 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a >> user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this >> changes with new vers

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 06/13/2012 09:18 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On 6/13/2012 12:00 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this changes with new versions of an ebuild it is dealt with automatically rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 6/13/2012 12:00 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a user's > home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this changes with > new versions of an ebuild it is dealt with automatically rather than > having to modify them in pkg_post

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 13-06-2012 12:00:16 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a user's > home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this changes with > new versions of an ebuild it is dealt with automatically rather than > having to modify them in p

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/06/12 01:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:00:16 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: > >> + ### force updates of some user properties + >> usermod -d "${ehome}" "${euser}" || die + usermod >> -s "$

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:00:16 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > + ### force updates of some user properties > + usermod -d "${ehome}" "${euser}" || die > + usermod -s "${eshell}" "${euser}" || die I think usermod can handle multiple arguments. -- Best reg

[gentoo-dev] RFC: enewuser should force updates to shell and home

2012-06-13 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey all - I'd like to propose that enewuser forces updates to a user's home dir and shell whenever it is called, so that if this changes with new versions of an ebuild it is dealt with automatically rather than having to modify them in pkg_postinst/p