On 01/17/2010 11:12 PM, David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
>> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
>> defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Any
On 01/19/2010 10:37 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Втр, 19/01/2010 в 01:22 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
>> On 01/18/2010 03:02 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote:
>>> The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in
>>> pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI
В Втр, 19/01/2010 в 01:22 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
> On 01/18/2010 03:02 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in
> > pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI 4.
> > Thus I'd keep them around until then.
>
On 01/18/2010 10:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
>> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause
>
> Agreed.
>
>> so attached is a patch only defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1
On 01/18/2010 03:02 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in
> pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI 4.
> Thus I'd keep them around until then.
>
> Cheers,
> Tiziano
>
ebeep or epause don't make your ebui
The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in
pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI 4.
Thus I'd keep them around until then.
Cheers,
Tiziano
Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2010, 22:38 +0200 schrieb Petteri Räty:
> With GLEP 42 and proper logging o
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause
Agreed.
> so attached is a patch only defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1
> and 2. Anyone have a reason to keep these around for EAP
On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> > defines these functions for EAPIs 0
On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to
> keep these around for EAPI 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.1.2010 21:38, Petteri Räty napsal(a):
> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a rea
With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to
keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch.
Regards,
Petteri
Ind
11 matches
Mail list logo
