On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Also, I think it may be useful for other arch teams (like amd64). One
> solution would be to add yet another flag, like amd64-at, but maybe we
> can have some better ideas.
The problem here is that it becomes extremely messy whe
On 4/26/10 12:34 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 11:40 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
>> comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
>
> Can you explain how the "TESTED" Keyword is not sufficient for your
> goal
On 04/26/2010 11:40 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
> comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
Can you explain how the "TESTED" Keyword is not sufficient for your
goal? It explicitly states: "Ebuilds that have been mar
To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
This is only an initial idea, and maybe a different implementation would
be better (like the status whiteboard, if it's easily searchable).
Initially, I'd like a new flag x86-at
