On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
>>
>> For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
>> unless it's either explicitly listed in IUSE or
On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
>
> For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
> unless it's either explicitly listed in IUSE or handled via a number of
> special magic profile variables,
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:36:40 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 12:24:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why we
> > > couldn't change what USERLAND means.
> >
> > But why change the meaning if it's confusing an unnecessary?
> > Perh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
>> IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
>> doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXP
On 04-04-2009 12:24:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why we
> > couldn't change what USERLAND means.
>
> But why change the meaning if it's confusing an unnecessary?
> Perhaps it's more appropriate to set IUSE_IMPLICIT="prefix".
This sounds
Zac Medico wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>>> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
>>> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
>>>
>> Sure it's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
>> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
> IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
> doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXPAND paradigm.
Were we after k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> So, my recommendation is to:
>> 1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
>> prefix profiles should use this flag.
>> 2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
>> 3) add
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>
> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
>
Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why w
On 04-04-2009 14:22:09 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
> > However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> > IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> > don't really like this idea because it exposes the u
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it exposed to the users.
Just of c
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
>>> It is not.
>> But can be added.
>
> I
On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
> >> that can be hidden.
> >
> > It is not.
>
> But can be added.
I think we talk about di
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
>> that can be hidden.
>
> It is not.
>
>
But can be added.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
> that can be hidden.
It is not.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
>>> IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
>>> don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
>>> don
On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >
> > However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> > IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> > don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
> > don't want it exposed
>
> However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
> don't want it exposed to the users.
>
If you don't want it exposed to users, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> So, my recommendation is to:
> 1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
> prefix profiles should use this flag.
> 2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
> 3) add entry to use.desc.
> adde
Hello all,
In the Gentoo Prefix project we have a special USE flag: 'prefix',
kind of like $ARCH USE flags. I am writing here to ask of the best way
to introduce a global implicit USE flag to gentoo-x86. There has been
some interest from other devs to kill diffs in ebuilds between
gentoo-x86 and pr
22 matches
Mail list logo
