On 08/02/2011 11:29 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:18:17 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>>> I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better
>>> integration with the package manager than USE flags should result
>>> in a better user experience.
>>
>> Are you will
On 8/2/11 11:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better
>> integration with the package manager than USE flags should result in a
>> better user experience.
>
> Are you willing to update and EAPI-bump all the eclasses? May I remind
> you that
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:58:56 -0700
> ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/11 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700
>> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
>> >> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend de
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:18:17 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better
> > integration with the package manager than USE flags should result
> > in a better user experience.
>
> Are you willing to update and EAPI-bump all the eclasses? May I
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:58:56 -0700
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> On 8/2/11 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700
> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> >> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for
> >> www-client/chromium, but I'm not sure if eclass
On 8/2/11 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700
> ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
>> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for
>> www-client/chromium, but I'm not sure if eclass is the right
>> implementation.
> I don't think we can start drafting until
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 09:35:05 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> I don't think we can start drafting until we agree on one solution.
> AFAICS there are two major ideas:
> 1) using special USEflags for that (which I can draft if you like),
> 2) copying DEPENDENCIES syntax from exherbo. I guess there's nothi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for
> www-client/chromium, but I'm not sure if eclass is the right
> implementation.
>
> I think I agree with Ciaran that this should be implemented as a PMS
> update. Let me
On 7/31/11 8:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> The last discussion on new solutions optional runtime depends lead to no
> agreement. Thus, I'd like to propose a solution extending the usability
> of current methods of handling them.
I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for
www-client
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:27:21 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> My idea is to create an eclass which would take a optional dependency
> list (e.g. through some kind of SDEPEND variable or so [being a bash
> array!]) and print it out to user in pkg_postinst().
Please don't. This should be worked out and
Hello, all.
The last discussion on new solutions optional runtime depends lead to no
agreement. Thus, I'd like to propose a solution extending the usability
of current methods of handling them.
My idea is to create an eclass which would take a optional dependency
list (e.g. through some kind of S
11 matches
Mail list logo
