Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On 09/06/15 03:21, Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreem

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:28:03 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > Sorry, I could I have sworn I saw something about "easier scripting" > somewhere in the thread. Now you have two problems. ;-) jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or policy on

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/08/2015 12:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metad

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 08:36:02 "Justin (jlec)" napisał(a): > On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18 > > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18 > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: >>> On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: >> On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: >>> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert >>> wrote: >>> Compatibility with sed scr

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: > > On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Compatibi

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: > On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert >> wrote: >> >>> Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about. ... > However, I do not disagree an

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On 06 Jun 2015 12:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Visual space is what you set in your editor. Which also gives tab > > the advantage that you can set it to something good for you, like > > 'more than 2 spaces so that it is readable'. > > *If* we sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about. > > and is something nobody should care about: xml is not a regular > language :) > If you are enforcing split lines on every si

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about. and is something nobody should care about: xml is not a regular language :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or policy on t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015, 09:26:08 schrieb Justin Lecher (jlec): > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing > the w

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

> The two options which are already suggested are > * 2 spaces > * single tab > So what should it be? Two spaces per indention with a maximum line width of 80 single-width Unicode grapheme clusters (equals the with of 80 ASCII characters). -- Allan Wegan Jabber: allanwe...@jabber.ccc.de OTR-F

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:25:33 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 06/06/15 09:26, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without > > having an agreement or polic

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > Visual space is what you set in your editor. Which also gives tab > the advantage that you can set it to something good for you, like > 'more than 2 spaces so that it is readable'. *If* we should agree on using tabs, then we should also standardise

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 10:02:53 Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > > >> Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no > >> indentation of the top-level elements. > > > That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes. > > Visual sp

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 10:02:53AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > > >> Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no > >> indentation of the top-level elements. > > > That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes. > > Visual s

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:26:08 > "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > > an agreemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote: >> Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no >> indentation of the top-level elements. > That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes. Visual space. Ulrich pgpYsZj5GseK_.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:46:27 Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > On Sat, 06 Jun 2015, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > > > * 2 spaces > > * single tab > > > So what should it be? > > Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no > indentation of the top-level elements. That's

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > * 2 spaces > * single tab > So what should it be? Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no indentation of the top-level elements. Ulrich pgpmxfmE7_yBp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:26:08 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing > the wrong. > > T

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

On 06/06/15 09:26, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? > > I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having > an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing > the wrong. > > The two

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing the wrong. The two options which a