Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/23/2012 10:40 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: Matt Turner schrieb: It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the keywords, you'll see that it's stabilized.) And on those platforms it will ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 April 2012 15:19:31 Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > > > All users are recommended to migrate: > > > > # emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0 > > # emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo > > How about mentioning revdep-rebuild in the instru

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Matt Turner schrieb: > It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't > have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the > keywords, you'll see that it's stabilized.) And on those platforms it will run equally fast or faster or slower? Best regards, Chí-Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > All users are recommended to migrate: > > # emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0 > # emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo How about mentioning revdep-rebuild in the instructions? -- Walter Dnes

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/23/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Yao wrote: On 04/23/12 06:16, Samuli Suominen wrote: I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to. Looks fine? - Samuli What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo? Matt's reply is accurate.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo? It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the keywords, you'll see that it's stabilize

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Richard Yao
On 04/23/12 06:16, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to. > > Looks fine? > > - Samuli What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/23/2012 01:43 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to. Looks fine? Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters only. Author

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to. > Looks fine? > Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters only. > Author: Samuli Suominen > Content-Type: text/

[gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to. Looks fine? - Samuli Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo Author: Samuli Suominen Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2012-04-23 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: =media-libs/jpeg-8* libjpeg-