Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 01 July 2006 03:01, Alin Nastac wrote: > Freeradius configure doesn't allow me to install unstripped binaries > unless I also add -g to CFLAGS (which means that the binary will contain then fix the build files to not strip the binaries regardless, forcing -g into CFLAGS is just as bro

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Alin Nastac
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:34, Alin Nastac wrote: > >> I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable >> from your pov? >> > > you're confusing things > > adding debugging symbols has nothing to do with the stripping of a binary > > the warn

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:34, Alin Nastac wrote: > I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable > from your pov? you're confusing things adding debugging symbols has nothing to do with the stripping of a binary the warning is because the binaries are stripped (`strip

[gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-06-30 Thread Alin Nastac
I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable from your pov? I ask this because net-dialup/freeradius allow me to install unstripped binaries but the correspondent configure option (--enable-developer) also append -g to CFLAGS. Otherwise, I will have to patch configure.in