On 12/28/2009 06:23 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
we should ENFORCE it, not just fill bugs about it, because mostly people
tend to ignore that things.
Agreed, although some presumption of innocence should be assumed. If a
dev is ignoring repoman output that is a fairly big violation, but if a
de
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Richard Freeman wrote:
> [..]
>
> Don't get me wrong - the QA team is doing a great job and I love Diego's
> work on the tinderbox. I've had a bug or two filed by them, and I've found
> that they've only been helpful when somebody actually bothers to try to
> reso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 28.12.2009 03:43, Richard Freeman napsal(a):
>
> Could this include documenting QA policies a bit better? Some are
> documented in scattered docs, some are in the ebuild quiz answers (which
> of course no two developers have the exact same answer
Started new subject since this is only tangentially related to the election.
On 12/27/2009 06:16 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Anyway, i wont write huge manifesto but these things i would like spent
my time:
QA propagation (motivating people, explaining why we are doing stuff and
so on)
Could thi
